Technology & ScienceDiscuss Both ViewsIntermediateHigh FrequencyFREE

IELTS Writing Task 2 Sample Answer: History (Cambridge IELTS 13)

Prompt

Some people say history is one of the most important school subjects. Other people think that, in today's world, subjects like science and technology are more important than history. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

#curriculum design#STEM education#critical thinking#historical literacy#career preparation

Ready?

Write this essay in 40 minutes

Start

✨

Band 7 → 9 — Band 7 argues for one or both subjects with practical reasoning, while Band 9 integrates both (history provides context for understanding technological impact; STEM drives prosperity) and examines what 'importance' means—immediate employment vs. long-term societal understanding.

Model essay

The debate between prioritising historical versus scientific education reflects tension between immediate utility and civic understanding. Whilst science and technology unquestionably furnish practical problem-solving tools essential for contemporary employment, I contend that history provides irreplaceable analytical and political literacy capabilities indispensable for informed citizenship in complex democracies. Proponents of science and technology prioritisation advance compelling practical arguments. Technology skills directly correlate with employment competitiveness and wage premiums; developing nations strategically prioritise STEM investment to compete globally. Scientific literacy enables individuals to navigate health decisions, environmental policies, and policy debates informed by empirical evidence. Furthermore, STEM subjects demonstrate quantifiable learning outcomes measurable through standardised assessment, simplifying educational accountability. Contemporary economies demonstrably reward technical expertise; engineers, data scientists, and technologists command disproportionate market value. These arguments convincingly demonstrate immediate practical relevance. Conversely, history develops distinctive analytical capabilities absent from purely technical curricula. Comparative historical analysis cultivates sophisticated causal reasoning and nuanced understanding of systemic patterns; history students develop interpretive skill sets unavailable through subjects emphasising correct answers and procedural mastery. Critically, historical literacy prevents naive repetition of documented errors; citizens without historical context become vulnerable to ideological manipulation and cyclical crises. Nations ignoring historical warnings concerning authoritarianism, conflict escalation, or inequality systematically encounter recurrent catastrophes. Furthermore, studying diverse societies and historical periods develops essential perspective-taking and contextual thinking absent from technical education. The solution is not false dichotomy but complementary integration. Optimal curricula ground technical knowledge in historical context, developing citizens who understand not merely 'how' technology functions but 'whether' and 'why' its application serves human flourishing. History and science represent complementary literacies addressing different but equally essential dimensions of informed citizenship. In conclusion, whilst technology addresses immediate practical problems, history prevents civilisational error and develops the critical judgment necessary for democratic deliberation.

Thesis

Whilst science and technology unquestionably address immediate practical needs, I contend that history provides irreplaceable civic understanding and critical thinking capabilities essential for informed citizenship in diverse democracies.

Body paragraph 1

Science and technology advocates emphasise contemporary relevance and economic competitiveness

Technology skills directly correlate with employment prospects and wage competitiveness
Scientific literacy enables health, environmental, and policy-informed decision-making
Global economic competition demands technological expertise
STEM subjects demonstrate quantifiable outcomes measurable by standardised assessment

e.g. Technology engineers command significantly higher salaries; developing nations prioritise STEM investment

Body paragraph 2

History develops irreplaceable analytical and civic capacities absent from purely technical education

Comparative history analysis develops sophisticated causal reasoning and nuance unavailable through other subjects
Understanding past injustices, conflicts, and systemic patterns informs contemporary political judgment
Historical literacy prevents naive repetition of documented errors and ideological manipulation
Contextual thinking and perspective-taking emerge from studying diverse societies and periods

e.g. Nations ignoring historical warning patterns concerning authoritarianism or inequality face recurrent crises

Counter-argument

Technology's immediate utility is undeniable, yet instrumental education without historical perspective produces technically proficient but civically illiterate populations

Conclusion

Optimal curricula integrate science and history as complementary rather than competing; technology addresses 'how,' history addresses 'why' and 'whether'

Word count: 291 words·Target: 250+ words for Task 2

Key concepts in this essay

interdisciplinary thinking
scientific literacy vs. historical literacy
educational purpose (job prep vs. informed citizenship)

Pitfalls the model essay avoids

Treating history and STEM as binary (instead of complementary)
Ignoring history's role in developing critical thinking and context
Using economic utility alone to judge subject importance

Next in Technology & Science

See all →